/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: b(u(x)) -> a(e(x)) c(u(x)) -> b(x) d(x) -> e(u(x)) d(u(x)) -> c(x) v(e(x)) -> x - Signature: {b/1,c/1,d/1,v/1} / {a/1,e/1,u/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c,d,e,u,v} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [1] x1 + [1] p(b) = [1] x1 + [8] p(c) = [1] x1 + [9] p(d) = [1] x1 + [13] p(e) = [1] x1 + [5] p(u) = [1] x1 + [0] p(v) = [1] x1 + [6] Following rules are strictly oriented: b(u(x)) = [1] x + [8] > [1] x + [6] = a(e(x)) c(u(x)) = [1] x + [9] > [1] x + [8] = b(x) d(x) = [1] x + [13] > [1] x + [5] = e(u(x)) d(u(x)) = [1] x + [13] > [1] x + [9] = c(x) v(e(x)) = [1] x + [11] > [1] x + [0] = x Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: * Step 2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: b(u(x)) -> a(e(x)) c(u(x)) -> b(x) d(x) -> e(u(x)) d(u(x)) -> c(x) v(e(x)) -> x - Signature: {b/1,c/1,d/1,v/1} / {a/1,e/1,u/1} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,c,d,e,u,v} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))