/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: WeightGap. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: .(x,\(x,y)) -> y .(x,e()) -> x .(/(y,x),x) -> y .(e(),x) -> x /(x,x) -> e() /(x,\(y,x)) -> y /(x,e()) -> x /(.(y,x),x) -> y \(x,x) -> e() \(x,.(x,y)) -> y \(/(x,y),x) -> y \(e(),x) -> x - Signature: {./2,//2,\/2} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {.,/,\,e} + Applied Processor: WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny} + Details: The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(.) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [9] p(/) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0] p(\) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [5] p(e) = [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: .(x,\(x,y)) = [2] x + [1] y + [14] > [1] y + [0] = y .(x,e()) = [1] x + [9] > [1] x + [0] = x .(/(y,x),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [9] > [1] y + [0] = y .(e(),x) = [1] x + [9] > [1] x + [0] = x /(x,\(y,x)) = [2] x + [1] y + [5] > [1] y + [0] = y /(.(y,x),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [9] > [1] y + [0] = y \(x,x) = [2] x + [5] > [0] = e() \(x,.(x,y)) = [2] x + [1] y + [14] > [1] y + [0] = y \(/(x,y),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [5] > [1] y + [0] = y \(e(),x) = [1] x + [5] > [1] x + [0] = x Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: /(x,x) = [2] x + [0] >= [0] = e() /(x,e()) = [1] x + [0] >= [1] x + [0] = x Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. * Step 2: WeightGap. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: /(x,x) -> e() /(x,e()) -> x - Weak TRS: .(x,\(x,y)) -> y .(x,e()) -> x .(/(y,x),x) -> y .(e(),x) -> x /(x,\(y,x)) -> y /(.(y,x),x) -> y \(x,x) -> e() \(x,.(x,y)) -> y \(/(x,y),x) -> y \(e(),x) -> x - Signature: {./2,//2,\/2} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {.,/,\,e} + Applied Processor: WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny} + Details: The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(.) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0] p(/) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [12] p(\) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0] p(e) = [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: /(x,x) = [2] x + [12] > [0] = e() /(x,e()) = [1] x + [12] > [1] x + [0] = x Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: .(x,\(x,y)) = [2] x + [1] y + [0] >= [1] y + [0] = y .(x,e()) = [1] x + [0] >= [1] x + [0] = x .(/(y,x),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [12] >= [1] y + [0] = y .(e(),x) = [1] x + [0] >= [1] x + [0] = x /(x,\(y,x)) = [2] x + [1] y + [12] >= [1] y + [0] = y /(.(y,x),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [12] >= [1] y + [0] = y \(x,x) = [2] x + [0] >= [0] = e() \(x,.(x,y)) = [2] x + [1] y + [0] >= [1] y + [0] = y \(/(x,y),x) = [2] x + [1] y + [12] >= [1] y + [0] = y \(e(),x) = [1] x + [0] >= [1] x + [0] = x Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: .(x,\(x,y)) -> y .(x,e()) -> x .(/(y,x),x) -> y .(e(),x) -> x /(x,x) -> e() /(x,\(y,x)) -> y /(x,e()) -> x /(.(y,x),x) -> y \(x,x) -> e() \(x,.(x,y)) -> y \(/(x,y),x) -> y \(e(),x) -> x - Signature: {./2,//2,\/2} / {e/0} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {.,/,\,e} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))