/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_rcdcRelativeAlsoLower /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 108 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) typed CpxTrs (13) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 431 ms] (14) BOUNDS(1, INF) (15) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxTRS (17) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (18) CpxRelTRS (19) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) CpxRelTRS (21) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (22) CpxWeightedTrs (23) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (27) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (29) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (30) CpxRNTS (31) InliningProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 158 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (34) CpxRNTS (35) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (36) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (37) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 1 ms] (38) CpxRNTS (39) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (40) CdtProblem (41) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (42) CdtProblem (43) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (44) CdtProblem (45) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (46) CdtProblem (47) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (48) CdtProblem (49) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (50) CdtProblem (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (52) CdtProblem (53) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (54) CdtProblem (55) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (56) CdtProblem (57) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (58) CdtProblem (59) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (60) CdtProblem (61) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (62) CdtProblem (63) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 3 ms] (64) CdtProblem (65) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (66) CdtProblem (67) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (68) CdtProblem (69) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (70) CdtProblem (71) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (72) CdtProblem (73) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (74) CdtProblem (75) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (76) CdtProblem (77) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (78) CdtProblem (79) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (80) CdtProblem (81) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (82) CdtProblem (83) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (84) CdtProblem (85) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 9 ms] (86) CdtProblem (87) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 11 ms] (88) CdtProblem (89) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 8 ms] (90) CdtProblem (91) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 5 ms] (92) CdtProblem (93) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (94) CdtProblem (95) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 22 ms] (96) CdtProblem (97) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (98) CdtProblem (99) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 14 ms] (100) CdtProblem (101) CdtForwardInstantiationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 33 ms] (102) CdtProblem (103) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 55 ms] (104) CdtProblem (105) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 11 ms] (106) CdtProblem (107) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 42 ms] (108) CdtProblem (109) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 12 ms] (110) CdtProblem (111) CdtRewritingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 28 ms] (112) CdtProblem ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> x1 a(a(b(x1))) -> c(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))) b(c(x1)) -> x1 S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> x1 a(a(b(x1))) -> c(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))) b(c(x1)) -> x1 The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> x1 a(a(b(x1))) -> c(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))) b(c(x1)) -> x1 The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(x1) -> x1 a(a(b(x1))) -> c(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))) b(c(x1)) -> x1 The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (7) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS