/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_rcdcRelativeAlsoLower /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 78 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (7) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence rec(up(x)) ->^+ up(rec(x)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [x / up(x)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (8) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: rec(rec(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(sent(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(no(x)) -> sent(rec(x)) rec(bot) -> up(sent(bot)) rec(up(x)) -> up(rec(x)) sent(up(x)) -> up(sent(x)) no(up(x)) -> up(no(x)) top(rec(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(sent(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) top(no(up(x))) -> top(check(rec(x))) check(up(x)) -> up(check(x)) check(sent(x)) -> sent(check(x)) check(rec(x)) -> rec(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(check(x)) check(no(x)) -> no(x) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(bot) -> bot encArg(up(x_1)) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_rec(x_1)) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_sent(x_1)) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_no(x_1)) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_rec(x_1) -> rec(encArg(x_1)) encode_sent(x_1) -> sent(encArg(x_1)) encode_no(x_1) -> no(encArg(x_1)) encode_bot -> bot encode_up(x_1) -> up(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST