/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_rcdcRelativeAlsoLower /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 283 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (7) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence f(found(x)) ->^+ found(f(x)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [x / found(x)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (8) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(f(x)) -> mark(x) top(active(c)) -> top(mark(c)) top(mark(x)) -> top(check(x)) check(f(x)) -> f(check(x)) check(x) -> start(match(f(X), x)) match(f(x), f(y)) -> f(match(x, y)) match(X, x) -> proper(x) proper(c) -> ok(c) proper(f(x)) -> f(proper(x)) f(ok(x)) -> ok(f(x)) start(ok(x)) -> found(x) f(found(x)) -> found(f(x)) top(found(x)) -> top(active(x)) active(f(x)) -> f(active(x)) f(mark(x)) -> mark(f(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(c) -> c encArg(X) -> X encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(found(x_1)) -> found(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_check(x_1)) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_match(x_1, x_2)) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_start(x_1)) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_c -> c encode_check(x_1) -> check(encArg(x_1)) encode_start(x_1) -> start(encArg(x_1)) encode_match(x_1, x_2) -> match(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_X -> X encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_found(x_1) -> found(encArg(x_1)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST