/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: WeightGap. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: b() -> f(a(),a()) f(a(),a()) -> g(d()) g(a()) -> g(b()) - Signature: {b/0,f/2,g/1} / {a/0,d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,d,f,g} + Applied Processor: WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny} + Details: The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [15] p(b) = [0] p(d) = [0] p(f) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] p(g) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(a(),a()) = [31] > [0] = g(d()) g(a()) = [15] > [0] = g(b()) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: b() = [0] >= [31] = f(a(),a()) Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. * Step 2: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: b() -> f(a(),a()) - Weak TRS: f(a(),a()) -> g(d()) g(a()) -> g(b()) - Signature: {b/0,f/2,g/1} / {a/0,d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,d,f,g} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation (containing no more than 1 non-zero interpretation-entries in the diagonal of the component-wise maxima): Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [3] [8] p(b) = [10] [1] p(d) = [3] [4] p(f) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1] [0 0] [0 0] [1] p(g) = [1 1] x1 + [0] [0 0] [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: b() = [10] [1] > [7] [1] = f(a(),a()) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: f(a(),a()) = [7] [1] >= [7] [1] = g(d()) g(a()) = [11] [1] >= [11] [1] = g(b()) * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: b() -> f(a(),a()) f(a(),a()) -> g(d()) g(a()) -> g(b()) - Signature: {b/0,f/2,g/1} / {a/0,d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,d,f,g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))