/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
* Step 1: NaturalMI.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(x,a()) -> x
            f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {a/0,g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,f,g}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation:
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          all
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(a) = [8]                  
          p(f) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
          p(g) = [1] x1 + [0]         
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(x,a()) = [1] x + [8]
                 > [1] x + [0]
                 = x          
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        f(x,g(y)) =  [1] x + [1] y + [0]
                  >= [1] x + [1] y + [0]
                  =  f(g(x),y)          
        
* Step 2: NaturalMI.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y)
        - Weak TRS:
            f(x,a()) -> x
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {a/0,g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,f,g}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation:
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          all
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(a) = [0]                      
                 [8]                      
          p(f) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0]
                 [0 1]      [0 1]      [0]
          p(g) = [1 0] x1 + [2]           
                 [0 1]      [1]           
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(x,g(y)) = [1 0] x + [1 1] y + [3]
                    [0 1]     [0 1]     [1]
                  > [1 0] x + [1 1] y + [2]
                    [0 1]     [0 1]     [1]
                  = f(g(x),y)              
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        f(x,a()) =  [1 0] x + [8]
                    [0 1]     [8]
                 >= [1 0] x + [0]
                    [0 1]     [0]
                 =  x            
        
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(x,a()) -> x
            f(x,g(y)) -> f(g(x),y)
        - Signature:
            {f/2} / {a/0,g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,f,g}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))