/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) * Step 1: WeightGap. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,0()) -> 0() *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y *(i(x),x) -> 1() - Signature: {*/2} / {0/0,1/0,i/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,0,1,i} + Applied Processor: WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny} + Details: The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(*) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [7] p(0) = [0] p(1) = [0] p(i) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: *(x,0()) = [1] x + [7] > [0] = 0() *(1(),y) = [1] y + [7] > [1] y + [0] = y *(i(x),x) = [2] x + [7] > [0] = 1() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: *(*(x,y),z) = [1] x + [1] y + [1] z + [14] >= [1] x + [1] y + [1] z + [14] = *(x,*(y,z)) Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. * Step 2: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z)) - Weak TRS: *(x,0()) -> 0() *(1(),y) -> y *(i(x),x) -> 1() - Signature: {*/2} / {0/0,1/0,i/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,0,1,i} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(*) = [1 6] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [1] p(0) = [7] [3] p(1) = [0] [0] p(i) = [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 1] [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: *(*(x,y),z) = [1 12] x + [1 6] y + [1 0] z + [6] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [2] > [1 6] x + [1 6] y + [1 0] z + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [2] = *(x,*(y,z)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: *(x,0()) = [1 6] x + [7] [0 1] [4] >= [7] [3] = 0() *(1(),y) = [1 0] y + [0] [0 1] [1] >= [1 0] y + [0] [0 1] [0] = y *(i(x),x) = [2 6] x + [6] [0 2] [2] >= [0] [0] = 1() * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: *(x,0()) -> 0() *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y *(i(x),x) -> 1() - Signature: {*/2} / {0/0,1/0,i/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,0,1,i} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))