/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) * Step 1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: +(0(),y) -> y +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y)) -(x,0()) -> x -(0(),y) -> 0() -(s(x),s(y)) -> -(x,y) - Signature: {+/2,-/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {+,-,0,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(+) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [11] p(-) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4] p(0) = [13] p(s) = [1] x1 + [4] Following rules are strictly oriented: +(0(),y) = [1] y + [24] > [1] y + [0] = y -(x,0()) = [1] x + [17] > [1] x + [0] = x -(0(),y) = [1] y + [17] > [13] = 0() -(s(x),s(y)) = [1] x + [1] y + [12] > [1] x + [1] y + [4] = -(x,y) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: +(s(x),y) = [1] x + [1] y + [15] >= [1] x + [1] y + [15] = s(+(x,y)) * Step 2: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y)) - Weak TRS: +(0(),y) -> y -(x,0()) -> x -(0(),y) -> 0() -(s(x),s(y)) -> -(x,y) - Signature: {+/2,-/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {+,-,0,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(+) = [1 1] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [0] [0 1] [0 1] [0] p(-) = [1 0] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [2] [0 1] [0 0] [0] p(0) = [2] [4] p(s) = [1 0] x1 + [4] [0 1] [4] Following rules are strictly oriented: +(s(x),y) = [1 1] x + [1 0] y + [8] [0 1] [0 1] [4] > [1 1] x + [1 0] y + [4] [0 1] [0 1] [4] = s(+(x,y)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: +(0(),y) = [1 0] y + [6] [0 1] [4] >= [1 0] y + [0] [0 1] [0] = y -(x,0()) = [1 0] x + [4] [0 1] [0] >= [1 0] x + [0] [0 1] [0] = x -(0(),y) = [1 0] y + [4] [0 0] [4] >= [2] [4] = 0() -(s(x),s(y)) = [1 0] x + [1 0] y + [10] [0 1] [0 0] [4] >= [1 0] x + [1 0] y + [2] [0 1] [0 0] [0] = -(x,y) * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: +(0(),y) -> y +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y)) -(x,0()) -> x -(0(),y) -> 0() -(s(x),s(y)) -> -(x,y) - Signature: {+/2,-/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {+,-,0,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))