/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 4(5(4(5(x1)))) -> 4(4(5(5(x1)))) 5(5(5(5(5(5(4(4(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(x1) - Signature: {0/1,4/1,5/1} / {1/1,2/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {0,1,2,4,5} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [1] x1 + [9] p(1) = [1] x1 + [7] p(2) = [1] x1 + [0] p(4) = [1] x1 + [3] p(5) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: 0(x1) = [1] x1 + [9] > [1] x1 + [7] = 1(x1) 5(5(5(5(5(5(4(4(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))) = [1] x1 + [18] > [1] x1 + [0] = 2(x1) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: 4(5(4(5(x1)))) = [1] x1 + [6] >= [1] x1 + [6] = 4(4(5(5(x1)))) * Step 2: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: 4(5(4(5(x1)))) -> 4(4(5(5(x1)))) - Weak TRS: 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 5(5(5(5(5(5(4(4(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(x1) - Signature: {0/1,4/1,5/1} / {1/1,2/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {0,1,2,4,5} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation (containing no more than 1 non-zero interpretation-entries in the diagonal of the component-wise maxima): Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] p(1) = [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] p(2) = [1 0] x1 + [1] [0 0] [0] p(4) = [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 0] [1] p(5) = [1 1] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: 4(5(4(5(x1)))) = [1 1] x1 + [1] [0 0] [1] > [1 1] x1 + [0] [0 0] [1] = 4(4(5(5(x1)))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: 0(x1) = [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] >= [1 0] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] = 1(x1) 5(5(5(5(5(5(4(4(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))) = [1 0] x1 + [1] [0 0] [0] >= [1 0] x1 + [1] [0 0] [0] = 2(x1) * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 4(5(4(5(x1)))) -> 4(4(5(5(x1)))) 5(5(5(5(5(5(4(4(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(x1) - Signature: {0/1,4/1,5/1} / {1/1,2/1} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {0,1,2,4,5} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))