/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_rcdcRelativeAlsoLower /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).

(0) DCpxTrs
(1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(2) CpxRelTRS
(3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 83 ms]
(4) CpxRelTRS
(5) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(6) CpxTRS
(7) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
(8) BOUNDS(1, n^1)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(b(a(c(b(a(x1))))))) -> a(b(a(c(b(b(a(b(a(c(x1))))))))))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem:

   encArg(a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1))


----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(b(a(c(b(a(x1))))))) -> a(b(a(c(b(b(a(b(a(c(x1))))))))))

The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules:

   encArg(a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID))
proved innermost termination of relative rules
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(b(a(c(b(a(x1))))))) -> a(b(a(c(b(b(a(b(a(c(x1))))))))))

The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules:

   encArg(a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(5) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
transformed relative TRS to TRS
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(b(a(c(b(a(x1))))))) -> a(b(a(c(b(b(a(b(a(c(x1))))))))))
   encArg(a(x_1)) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1))
   encArg(cons_b(x_1)) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_b(x_1) -> b(encArg(x_1))
   encode_a(x_1) -> a(encArg(x_1))
   encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
----------------------------------------

(7) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 4. 
The certificate found is represented by the following graph.

"[34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]
{(34,35,[b_1|0, encArg_1|0, encode_b_1|0, encode_a_1|0, encode_c_1|0]), (34,36,[a_1|1, c_1|1, b_1|1]), (34,37,[a_1|2]), (35,35,[a_1|0, c_1|0, cons_b_1|0]), (36,35,[encArg_1|1]), (36,36,[a_1|1, c_1|1, b_1|1]), (36,37,[a_1|2]), (37,38,[b_1|2]), (38,39,[a_1|2]), (39,40,[c_1|2]), (40,41,[b_1|2]), (40,46,[a_1|3]), (41,42,[b_1|2]), (41,37,[a_1|2]), (41,55,[a_1|3]), (42,43,[a_1|2]), (43,44,[b_1|2]), (44,45,[a_1|2]), (45,36,[c_1|2]), (45,37,[c_1|2]), (45,55,[c_1|2]), (46,47,[b_1|3]), (47,48,[a_1|3]), (48,49,[c_1|3]), (49,50,[b_1|3]), (50,51,[b_1|3]), (50,55,[a_1|3]), (50,64,[a_1|4]), (51,52,[a_1|3]), (52,53,[b_1|3]), (53,54,[a_1|3]), (54,37,[c_1|3]), (54,55,[c_1|3]), (55,56,[b_1|3]), (56,57,[a_1|3]), (57,58,[c_1|3]), (58,59,[b_1|3]), (59,60,[b_1|3]), (60,61,[a_1|3]), (61,62,[b_1|3]), (62,63,[a_1|3]), (63,39,[c_1|3]), (63,57,[c_1|3]), (64,65,[b_1|4]), (65,66,[a_1|4]), (66,67,[c_1|4]), (67,68,[b_1|4]), (68,69,[b_1|4]), (69,70,[a_1|4]), (70,71,[b_1|4]), (71,72,[a_1|4]), (72,57,[c_1|4])}"
----------------------------------------

(8)
BOUNDS(1, n^1)