/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: c() -> d() f(f(X)) -> c() h(X) -> c() - Signature: {c/0,f/1,h/1} / {d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {c,d,f,h} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(c) = [8] p(d) = [0] p(f) = [1] x1 + [4] p(h) = [1] x1 + [8] Following rules are strictly oriented: c() = [8] > [0] = d() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: f(f(X)) = [1] X + [8] >= [8] = c() h(X) = [1] X + [8] >= [8] = c() * Step 2: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(f(X)) -> c() h(X) -> c() - Weak TRS: c() -> d() - Signature: {c/0,f/1,h/1} / {d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {c,d,f,h} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(c) = [0] p(d) = [0] p(f) = [1] x1 + [4] p(h) = [1] x1 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(f(X)) = [1] X + [8] > [0] = c() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: c() = [0] >= [0] = d() h(X) = [1] X + [0] >= [0] = c() * Step 3: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: h(X) -> c() - Weak TRS: c() -> d() f(f(X)) -> c() - Signature: {c/0,f/1,h/1} / {d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {c,d,f,h} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation: Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(c) = [4] p(d) = [0] p(f) = [1] x1 + [2] p(h) = [1] x1 + [12] Following rules are strictly oriented: h(X) = [1] X + [12] > [4] = c() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: c() = [4] >= [0] = d() f(f(X)) = [1] X + [4] >= [4] = c() * Step 4: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: c() -> d() f(f(X)) -> c() h(X) -> c() - Signature: {c/0,f/1,h/1} / {d/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {c,d,f,h} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))