/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),x))))))) -> f(a() ,f(b() ,f(a() ,f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),x))))))))) - Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,b/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,f} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 3. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 1 a_1() -> 2 a_1() -> 6 a_1() -> 8 a_1() -> 12 a_1() -> 14 a_1() -> 16 a_2() -> 22 a_2() -> 26 a_2() -> 28 a_2() -> 32 a_2() -> 34 a_2() -> 36 a_3() -> 66 a_3() -> 70 a_3() -> 72 a_3() -> 76 a_3() -> 78 a_3() -> 80 b_0() -> 1 b_1() -> 4 b_1() -> 10 b_1() -> 18 b_2() -> 24 b_2() -> 30 b_2() -> 38 b_3() -> 68 b_3() -> 74 b_3() -> 82 f_0(1,1) -> 1 f_1(2,3) -> 1 f_1(4,5) -> 3 f_1(6,7) -> 5 f_1(8,9) -> 7 f_1(10,11) -> 9 f_1(12,13) -> 11 f_1(14,15) -> 13 f_1(16,3) -> 13 f_1(16,3) -> 52 f_1(16,17) -> 15 f_1(18,1) -> 17 f_1(18,3) -> 17 f_1(18,7) -> 17 f_1(18,13) -> 17 f_1(18,39) -> 17 f_1(18,47) -> 17 f_2(22,23) -> 13 f_2(24,25) -> 23 f_2(26,27) -> 25 f_2(28,29) -> 27 f_2(30,31) -> 29 f_2(32,33) -> 31 f_2(34,35) -> 33 f_2(36,23) -> 52 f_2(36,23) -> 88 f_2(36,37) -> 35 f_2(36,39) -> 5 f_2(36,39) -> 48 f_2(36,41) -> 40 f_2(36,42) -> 41 f_2(36,44) -> 43 f_2(36,45) -> 44 f_2(36,46) -> 45 f_2(36,47) -> 11 f_2(36,47) -> 51 f_2(36,49) -> 48 f_2(36,50) -> 49 f_2(36,52) -> 51 f_2(36,53) -> 52 f_2(36,54) -> 53 f_2(38,3) -> 37 f_2(38,7) -> 46 f_2(38,9) -> 37 f_2(38,13) -> 54 f_2(38,15) -> 37 f_2(38,17) -> 37 f_2(38,23) -> 37 f_2(38,27) -> 46 f_2(38,33) -> 54 f_2(38,39) -> 46 f_2(38,40) -> 39 f_2(38,43) -> 42 f_2(38,47) -> 54 f_2(38,48) -> 47 f_2(38,51) -> 50 f_3(66,67) -> 48 f_3(68,69) -> 67 f_3(70,71) -> 69 f_3(72,73) -> 71 f_3(74,75) -> 73 f_3(76,77) -> 75 f_3(78,79) -> 77 f_3(80,67) -> 84 f_3(80,81) -> 79 f_3(80,83) -> 51 f_3(80,83) -> 87 f_3(80,85) -> 84 f_3(80,86) -> 85 f_3(80,88) -> 87 f_3(80,89) -> 88 f_3(80,90) -> 89 f_3(82,27) -> 81 f_3(82,33) -> 90 f_3(82,84) -> 83 f_3(82,87) -> 86 * Step 2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),x))))))) -> f(a() ,f(b() ,f(a() ,f(a(),f(b(),f(a(),f(a(),f(a(),f(b(),x))))))))) - Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,b/0} - Obligation: innermost derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,b,f} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))