/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,0()) -> x add0(x',S(x)) -> +(S(0()),add0(x',x)) mult(x,0()) -> 0() mult(x',S(x)) -> add0(x',mult(x',x)) power(x,0()) -> S(0()) power(x',S(x)) -> mult(x',power(x',x)) - Weak TRS: +(x,S(0())) -> S(x) +(S(0()),y) -> S(y) - Signature: {+/2,add0/2,mult/2,power/2} / {0/0,S/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+,add0,mult,power} and constructors {0,S} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,0()) -> x add0(x',S(x)) -> +(S(0()),add0(x',x)) mult(x,0()) -> 0() mult(x',S(x)) -> add0(x',mult(x',x)) power(x,0()) -> S(0()) power(x',S(x)) -> mult(x',power(x',x)) - Weak TRS: +(x,S(0())) -> S(x) +(S(0()),y) -> S(y) - Signature: {+/2,add0/2,mult/2,power/2} / {0/0,S/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+,add0,mult,power} and constructors {0,S} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 2.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,0()) -> x add0(x',S(x)) -> +(S(0()),add0(x',x)) mult(x,0()) -> 0() mult(x',S(x)) -> add0(x',mult(x',x)) power(x,0()) -> S(0()) power(x',S(x)) -> mult(x',power(x',x)) - Weak TRS: +(x,S(0())) -> S(x) +(S(0()),y) -> S(y) - Signature: {+/2,add0/2,mult/2,power/2} / {0/0,S/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+,add0,mult,power} and constructors {0,S} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "+") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "S") :: ["A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "S") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "add0") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "mult") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "power") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: add0(x,0()) -> x add0(x',S(x)) -> +(S(0()),add0(x',x)) mult(x,0()) -> 0() mult(x',S(x)) -> add0(x',mult(x',x)) power(x,0()) -> S(0()) power(x',S(x)) -> mult(x',power(x',x)) main(x1,x2) -> power(x1,x2) 2. Weak: ** Step 2.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,0()) -> x add0(x',S(x)) -> +(S(0()),add0(x',x)) mult(x,0()) -> 0() mult(x',S(x)) -> add0(x',mult(x',x)) power(x,0()) -> S(0()) power(x',S(x)) -> mult(x',power(x',x)) - Weak TRS: +(x,S(0())) -> S(x) +(S(0()),y) -> S(y) - Signature: {+/2,add0/2,mult/2,power/2} / {0/0,S/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+,add0,mult,power} and constructors {0,S} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: add0(x,y){y -> S(y)} = add0(x,S(y)) ->^+ +(S(0()),add0(x,y)) = C[add0(x,y) = add0(x,y){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)