/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: eqZList(C(x1,x2),C(y1,y2)) -> and(eqZList(x1,y1),eqZList(x2,y2)) eqZList(C(x1,x2),Z()) -> False() eqZList(Z(),C(y1,y2)) -> False() eqZList(Z(),Z()) -> True() f(C(x1,x2)) -> C(f(x1),f(x2)) f(Z()) -> Z() first(C(x1,x2)) -> x1 g(x) -> x second(C(x1,x2)) -> x2 - Weak TRS: and(False(),False()) -> False() and(False(),True()) -> False() and(True(),False()) -> False() and(True(),True()) -> True() - Signature: {and/2,eqZList/2,f/1,first/1,g/1,second/1} / {C/2,False/0,True/0,Z/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and,eqZList,f,first,g,second} and constructors {C,False ,True,Z} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: eqZList(C(x1,x2),C(y1,y2)) -> and(eqZList(x1,y1),eqZList(x2,y2)) eqZList(C(x1,x2),Z()) -> False() eqZList(Z(),C(y1,y2)) -> False() eqZList(Z(),Z()) -> True() f(C(x1,x2)) -> C(f(x1),f(x2)) f(Z()) -> Z() first(C(x1,x2)) -> x1 g(x) -> x second(C(x1,x2)) -> x2 - Weak TRS: and(False(),False()) -> False() and(False(),True()) -> False() and(True(),False()) -> False() and(True(),True()) -> True() - Signature: {and/2,eqZList/2,f/1,first/1,g/1,second/1} / {C/2,False/0,True/0,Z/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and,eqZList,f,first,g,second} and constructors {C,False ,True,Z} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: eqZList(C(x1,x2),C(y1,y2)) -> and(eqZList(x1,y1),eqZList(x2,y2)) eqZList(C(x1,x2),Z()) -> False() eqZList(Z(),C(y1,y2)) -> False() eqZList(Z(),Z()) -> True() f(C(x1,x2)) -> C(f(x1),f(x2)) f(Z()) -> Z() first(C(x1,x2)) -> x1 g(x) -> x second(C(x1,x2)) -> x2 - Weak TRS: and(False(),False()) -> False() and(False(),True()) -> False() and(True(),False()) -> False() and(True(),True()) -> True() - Signature: {and/2,eqZList/2,f/1,first/1,g/1,second/1} / {C/2,False/0,True/0,Z/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and,eqZList,f,first,g,second} and constructors {C,False ,True,Z} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: eqZList(x,z){x -> C(x,y),z -> C(z,u)} = eqZList(C(x,y),C(z,u)) ->^+ and(eqZList(x,z),eqZList(y,u)) = C[eqZList(x,z) = eqZList(x,z){}] ** Step 1.b:1: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: eqZList(C(x1,x2),C(y1,y2)) -> and(eqZList(x1,y1),eqZList(x2,y2)) eqZList(C(x1,x2),Z()) -> False() eqZList(Z(),C(y1,y2)) -> False() eqZList(Z(),Z()) -> True() f(C(x1,x2)) -> C(f(x1),f(x2)) f(Z()) -> Z() first(C(x1,x2)) -> x1 g(x) -> x second(C(x1,x2)) -> x2 - Weak TRS: and(False(),False()) -> False() and(False(),True()) -> False() and(True(),False()) -> False() and(True(),True()) -> True() - Signature: {and/2,eqZList/2,f/1,first/1,g/1,second/1} / {C/2,False/0,True/0,Z/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and,eqZList,f,first,g,second} and constructors {C,False ,True,Z} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. C_0(2,2) -> 1 C_0(2,2) -> 2 C_1(5,6) -> 1 C_1(6,6) -> 5 C_1(6,6) -> 6 False_0() -> 1 False_0() -> 2 False_1() -> 1 False_1() -> 3 False_1() -> 4 True_0() -> 1 True_0() -> 2 True_1() -> 1 True_1() -> 3 True_1() -> 4 Z_0() -> 1 Z_0() -> 2 Z_1() -> 1 Z_1() -> 5 Z_1() -> 6 and_0(2,2) -> 1 and_1(3,4) -> 1 and_1(4,4) -> 3 and_1(4,4) -> 4 eqZList_0(2,2) -> 1 eqZList_1(2,2) -> 3 eqZList_1(2,2) -> 4 f_0(2) -> 1 f_1(2) -> 5 f_1(2) -> 6 first_0(2) -> 1 g_0(2) -> 1 second_0(2) -> 1 2 -> 1 ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: and(False(),False()) -> False() and(False(),True()) -> False() and(True(),False()) -> False() and(True(),True()) -> True() eqZList(C(x1,x2),C(y1,y2)) -> and(eqZList(x1,y1),eqZList(x2,y2)) eqZList(C(x1,x2),Z()) -> False() eqZList(Z(),C(y1,y2)) -> False() eqZList(Z(),Z()) -> True() f(C(x1,x2)) -> C(f(x1),f(x2)) f(Z()) -> Z() first(C(x1,x2)) -> x1 g(x) -> x second(C(x1,x2)) -> x2 - Signature: {and/2,eqZList/2,f/1,first/1,g/1,second/1} / {C/2,False/0,True/0,Z/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and,eqZList,f,first,g,second} and constructors {C,False ,True,Z} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))