/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () *** Step 1.a:1.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "f") :: ["A"(1)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "g") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: f(g(X)) -> f(X) main(x1) -> f(x1) 2. Weak: *** Step 1.a:1.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(x){x -> g(x)} = f(g(x)) ->^+ f(x) = C[f(x) = f(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: none Following symbols are considered usable: {f} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(f) = [1] x1 + [0] p(g) = [1] x1 + [4] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(g(X)) = [1] X + [4] > [1] X + [0] = f(X) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(g(X)) -> f(X) - Signature: {f/1} / {g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))