/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tct-trs: Prelude.head: empty list tct-trs: Prelude.head: empty list tct-trs: Prelude.head: empty list tct-trs: Prelude.head: empty list WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x))) minus(x,0()) -> x minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y) - Signature: {f/1,g/1,minus/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g,minus} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x))) minus(x,0()) -> x minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y) - Signature: {f/1,g/1,minus/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g,minus} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 2.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x))) minus(x,0()) -> x minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y) - Signature: {f/1,g/1,minus/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g,minus} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "f") :: ["A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "g") :: ["A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "minus") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x))) minus(x,0()) -> x minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y) main(x1,x2) -> minus(x1,x2) 2. Weak: ** Step 2.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),g(f(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> minus(s(x),f(g(x))) minus(x,0()) -> x minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y) - Signature: {f/1,g/1,minus/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g,minus} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(x){x -> s(x)} = f(s(x)) ->^+ minus(s(x),g(f(x))) = C[f(x) = f(x){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)