/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () *** Step 1.a:1.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "*") :: ["A"(1, 1, 1) x "A"(0, 0, 0)] -(1)-> "A"(0, 0, 0) F (TrsFun "+") :: ["A"(0, 0, 0) x "A"(0, 0, 0)] -(0)-> "A"(0, 0, 0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1, 1, 1) x "A"(0, 0, 0)] -(1)-> "A"(0, 0, 0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) main(x1,x2) -> *(x1,x2) 2. Weak: *** Step 1.a:1.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: *(x,y){y -> +(y,z)} = *(x,+(y,z)) ->^+ +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) = C[*(x,y) = *(x,y){}] ** Step 1.b:1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(+) = {1,2} Following symbols are considered usable: {*} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(*) = [4] x2 + [8] p(+) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [3] Following rules are strictly oriented: *(x,+(y,z)) = [4] y + [4] z + [20] > [4] y + [4] z + [19] = +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))