/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,Nil()) -> x add0(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> power(x,y) mult(x,Nil()) -> Nil() mult(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> add0(x',mult(x',xs)) power(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) power(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> mult(x',power(x',xs)) - Signature: {add0/2,goal/2,mult/2,power/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add0,goal,mult,power} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,Nil()) -> x add0(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> power(x,y) mult(x,Nil()) -> Nil() mult(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> add0(x',mult(x',xs)) power(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) power(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> mult(x',power(x',xs)) - Signature: {add0/2,goal/2,mult/2,power/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add0,goal,mult,power} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 2.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,Nil()) -> x add0(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> power(x,y) mult(x,Nil()) -> Nil() mult(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> add0(x',mult(x',xs)) power(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) power(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> mult(x',power(x',xs)) - Signature: {add0/2,goal/2,mult/2,power/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add0,goal,mult,power} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "Cons") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "Cons") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "Nil") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "Nil") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "add0") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "goal") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "mult") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "power") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: add0(x,Nil()) -> x add0(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> power(x,y) mult(x,Nil()) -> Nil() mult(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> add0(x',mult(x',xs)) power(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) power(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> mult(x',power(x',xs)) main(x1,x2) -> power(x1,x2) 2. Weak: ** Step 2.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add0(x,Nil()) -> x add0(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> power(x,y) mult(x,Nil()) -> Nil() mult(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> add0(x',mult(x',xs)) power(x,Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) power(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> mult(x',power(x',xs)) - Signature: {add0/2,goal/2,mult/2,power/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add0,goal,mult,power} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: add0(x,z){z -> Cons(y,z)} = add0(x,Cons(y,z)) ->^+ Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),add0(x,z)) = C[add0(x,z) = add0(x,z){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)