/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () *** Step 1.a:1.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "Cons") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "Cons") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "Nil") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "Nil") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "anchored") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "goal") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) main(x1,x2) -> goal(x1,x2) 2. Weak: *** Step 1.a:1.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: anchored(y,z){y -> Cons(x,y)} = anchored(Cons(x,y),z) ->^+ anchored(y,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),z)) = C[anchored(y,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),z)) = anchored(y,z){z -> Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),z)}] ** Step 1.b:1: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. Cons_0(1,1) -> 1 Cons_0(1,1) -> 3 Cons_0(1,1) -> 4 Cons_0(1,2) -> 1 Cons_0(1,2) -> 3 Cons_0(1,2) -> 4 Cons_0(2,1) -> 1 Cons_0(2,1) -> 3 Cons_0(2,1) -> 4 Cons_0(2,2) -> 1 Cons_0(2,2) -> 3 Cons_0(2,2) -> 4 Cons_1(6,1) -> 3 Cons_1(6,1) -> 4 Cons_1(6,1) -> 5 Cons_1(6,2) -> 3 Cons_1(6,2) -> 4 Cons_1(6,2) -> 5 Cons_1(6,5) -> 3 Cons_1(6,5) -> 4 Cons_1(6,5) -> 5 Cons_1(7,8) -> 6 Nil_0() -> 2 Nil_0() -> 3 Nil_0() -> 4 Nil_1() -> 7 Nil_1() -> 8 anchored_0(1,1) -> 3 anchored_0(1,2) -> 3 anchored_0(2,1) -> 3 anchored_0(2,2) -> 3 anchored_1(1,1) -> 4 anchored_1(1,2) -> 4 anchored_1(1,5) -> 3 anchored_1(1,5) -> 4 anchored_1(2,1) -> 4 anchored_1(2,2) -> 4 anchored_1(2,5) -> 3 anchored_1(2,5) -> 4 goal_0(1,1) -> 4 goal_0(1,2) -> 4 goal_0(2,1) -> 4 goal_0(2,2) -> 4 1 -> 3 1 -> 4 2 -> 3 2 -> 4 5 -> 3 5 -> 4 ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: anchored(Cons(x,xs),y) -> anchored(xs,Cons(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),y)) anchored(Nil(),y) -> y goal(x,y) -> anchored(x,y) - Signature: {anchored/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {anchored,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))