/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(a(),g(y)) -> g(g(y)) f(g(x),a()) -> f(x,g(a())) f(g(x),g(y)) -> h(g(y),x,g(y)) h(a(),y,z) -> z h(g(x),y,z) -> f(y,h(x,y,z)) - Signature: {f/2,h/3} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,h} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(a(),g(y)) -> g(g(y)) f(g(x),a()) -> f(x,g(a())) f(g(x),g(y)) -> h(g(y),x,g(y)) h(a(),y,z) -> z h(g(x),y,z) -> f(y,h(x,y,z)) - Signature: {f/2,h/3} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,h} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 2.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(a(),g(y)) -> g(g(y)) f(g(x),a()) -> f(x,g(a())) f(g(x),g(y)) -> h(g(y),x,g(y)) h(a(),y,z) -> z h(g(x),y,z) -> f(y,h(x,y,z)) - Signature: {f/2,h/3} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,h} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "a") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "a") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "f") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "g") :: ["A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "g") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "h") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: f(a(),g(y)) -> g(g(y)) f(g(x),a()) -> f(x,g(a())) f(g(x),g(y)) -> h(g(y),x,g(y)) h(a(),y,z) -> z h(g(x),y,z) -> f(y,h(x,y,z)) main(x1,x2,x3) -> h(x1,x2,x3) 2. Weak: ** Step 2.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(a(),g(y)) -> g(g(y)) f(g(x),a()) -> f(x,g(a())) f(g(x),g(y)) -> h(g(y),x,g(y)) h(a(),y,z) -> z h(g(x),y,z) -> f(y,h(x,y,z)) - Signature: {f/2,h/3} / {a/0,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,h} and constructors {a,g} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: h(x,y,z){x -> g(x)} = h(g(x),y,z) ->^+ f(y,h(x,y,z)) = C[h(x,y,z) = h(x,y,z){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)