/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxTRS (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) typed CpxTrs (9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 458 ms] (12) proven lower bound (13) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (14) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 1. The certificate found is represented by the following graph. "[1, 2, 3, 4] {(1,2,[a_1|0]), (1,3,[b_1|1]), (2,2,[b_1|0]), (3,4,[b_1|1]), (4,2,[a_1|1]), (4,3,[b_1|1])}" ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (5) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (7) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Infered types. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Innermost TRS: Rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) Types: a :: b -> b b :: b -> b hole_b1_0 :: b gen_b2_0 :: Nat -> b ---------------------------------------- (9) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols: a ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Innermost TRS: Rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) Types: a :: b -> b b :: b -> b hole_b1_0 :: b gen_b2_0 :: Nat -> b Generator Equations: gen_b2_0(0) <=> hole_b1_0 gen_b2_0(+(x, 1)) <=> b(gen_b2_0(x)) The following defined symbols remain to be analysed: a ---------------------------------------- (11) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Proved the following rewrite lemma: a(gen_b2_0(+(1, n4_0))) -> *3_0, rt in Omega(n4_0) Induction Base: a(gen_b2_0(+(1, 0))) Induction Step: a(gen_b2_0(+(1, +(n4_0, 1)))) ->_R^Omega(1) b(b(a(gen_b2_0(+(1, n4_0))))) ->_IH b(b(*3_0)) We have rt in Omega(n^1) and sz in O(n). Thus, we have irc_R in Omega(n). ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: Innermost TRS: Rules: a(b(x)) -> b(b(a(x))) Types: a :: b -> b b :: b -> b hole_b1_0 :: b gen_b2_0 :: Nat -> b Generator Equations: gen_b2_0(0) <=> hole_b1_0 gen_b2_0(+(x, 1)) <=> b(gen_b2_0(x)) The following defined symbols remain to be analysed: a ---------------------------------------- (13) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (14) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)