/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
* Step 1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
** Step 1.a:1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
*** Step 1.a:1.a:1: Ara.  MAYBE
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False}
    + Details:
        Signatures used:
        ----------------
          F (TrsFun "+") :: ["A"(0) x "A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1)
          F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1)
          F (TrsFun "sum") :: ["A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0)
          F (TrsFun "sum1") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(0)
        
        
        Cost-free Signatures used:
        --------------------------
        
        
        
        Base Constructor Signatures used:
        ---------------------------------
        
        
        
        Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as:
        -------------------------------------------
        1. Strict:
          sum(0()) -> 0()
          sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
          sum1(0()) -> 0()
          sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
          main(x1) -> sum1(x1)
        2. Weak:
          
        

*** Step 1.a:1.b:1: DecreasingLoops.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
    + Details:
        The system has following decreasing Loops:
          sum(x){x -> s(x)} =
            sum(s(x)) ->^+ +(sum(x),s(x))
              = C[sum(x) = sum(x){}]

** Step 1.b:1: NaturalMI.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          uargs(+) = {1},
          uargs(s) = {1}
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {sum,sum1}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
             p(+) = [1] x1 + [6] 
             p(0) = [1]          
             p(s) = [1] x1 + [8] 
           p(sum) = [1] x1 + [8] 
          p(sum1) = [2] x1 + [10]
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
          sum(0()) = [9]                 
                   > [1]                 
                   = 0()                 
        
         sum(s(x)) = [1] x + [16]        
                   > [1] x + [14]        
                   = +(sum(x),s(x))      
        
         sum1(0()) = [12]                
                   > [1]                 
                   = 0()                 
        
        sum1(s(x)) = [2] x + [26]        
                   > [2] x + [24]        
                   = s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        
** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            sum(0()) -> 0()
            sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x),s(x))
            sum1(0()) -> 0()
            sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x),+(x,x)))
        - Signature:
            {sum/1,sum1/1} / {+/2,0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {sum,sum1} and constructors {+,0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))