/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rci /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: ack(0(),y) -> s(y) ack(s(x),0()) -> ack(x,s(0())) ack(s(x),s(y)) -> ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) - Signature: {ack/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {ack} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: ack(0(),y) -> s(y) ack(s(x),0()) -> ack(x,s(0())) ack(s(x),s(y)) -> ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) - Signature: {ack/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {ack} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 2.a:1: Ara. MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: ack(0(),y) -> s(y) ack(s(x),0()) -> ack(x,s(0())) ack(s(x),s(y)) -> ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) - Signature: {ack/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {ack} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Ara {minDegree = 1, maxDegree = 3, araTimeout = 15, araRuleShifting = Just 1, isBestCase = True, mkCompletelyDefined = False, verboseOutput = False} + Details: Signatures used: ---------------- F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "0") :: [] -(0)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "ack") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "main") :: ["A"(1) x "A"(0)] -(1)-> "A"(0) F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(1)] -(1)-> "A"(1) F (TrsFun "s") :: ["A"(0)] -(0)-> "A"(0) Cost-free Signatures used: -------------------------- Base Constructor Signatures used: --------------------------------- Following Still Strict Rules were Typed as: ------------------------------------------- 1. Strict: ack(0(),y) -> s(y) ack(s(x),0()) -> ack(x,s(0())) ack(s(x),s(y)) -> ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) main(x1,x2) -> ack(x1,x2) 2. Weak: ** Step 2.b:1: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: ack(0(),y) -> s(y) ack(s(x),0()) -> ack(x,s(0())) ack(s(x),s(y)) -> ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) - Signature: {ack/2} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {ack} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: ack(s(x),y){y -> s(y)} = ack(s(x),s(y)) ->^+ ack(x,ack(s(x),y)) = C[ack(s(x),y) = ack(s(x),y){}] WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)