/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: plus(x,y){y -> s(y)} = plus(x,s(y)) ->^+ s(plus(x,y)) = C[plus(x,y) = plus(x,y){}] ** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules ** Step 1.b:2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_0() -> 2 0_0() -> 3 activate_0(2) -> 1 activate_1(2) -> 1 and_0(2,2) -> 1 plus_0(2,2) -> 1 plus_1(2,2) -> 3 s_0(2) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 2 s_0(2) -> 3 s_1(3) -> 1 s_1(3) -> 3 tt_0() -> 1 tt_0() -> 2 tt_0() -> 3 2 -> 1 2 -> 3 ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: activate(X) -> X and(tt(),X) -> activate(X) plus(N,0()) -> N plus(N,s(M)) -> s(plus(N,M)) - Signature: {activate/1,and/2,plus/2} / {0/0,s/1,tt/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,and,plus} and constructors {0,s,tt} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))