/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(a()))) - Signature: {activate/1,f/1} / {a/0,g/1,n__f/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f} and constructors {a,g,n__f} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(a()))) - Signature: {activate/1,f/1} / {a/0,g/1,n__f/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f} and constructors {a,g,n__f} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 1 a_0() -> 2 activate_0(2) -> 1 f_0(2) -> 1 f_1(2) -> 1 g_0(2) -> 1 g_0(2) -> 2 n__f_0(2) -> 1 n__f_0(2) -> 2 n__f_1(2) -> 1 n__f_2(2) -> 1 2 -> 1 * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(a()))) - Signature: {activate/1,f/1} / {a/0,g/1,n__f/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f} and constructors {a,g,n__f} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))