/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) DecreasingLoopProof [FINISHED, 193 ms] (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, V1) -> U12(isNatList(activate(V1))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1) -> U22(isNat(activate(V1))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isNatList(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isNatList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V1, V2) -> U62(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U62(tt, V2) -> U63(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U63(tt) -> tt U71(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) U81(tt) -> nil U91(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(activate(N), n__take(activate(M), activate(IL))) and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isNat(n__0) -> tt isNat(n__length(V1)) -> U11(isNatIListKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNat(n__s(V1)) -> U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNatIList(V) -> U31(isNatIListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNatIList(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatIListKind(n__nil) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatIListKind(n__take(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatKind(n__0) -> tt isNatKind(n__length(V1)) -> isNatIListKind(activate(V1)) isNatKind(n__s(V1)) -> isNatKind(activate(V1)) isNatList(n__nil) -> tt isNatList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatList(n__take(V1, V2)) -> U61(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U71(and(and(isNatList(activate(L)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(L))), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), activate(L)) take(0, IL) -> U81(and(isNatIList(IL), n__isNatIListKind(IL))) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U91(and(and(isNatIList(activate(IL)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(IL))), n__and(n__and(n__isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))), activate(IL), M, N) zeros -> n__zeros take(X1, X2) -> n__take(X1, X2) 0 -> n__0 length(X) -> n__length(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) isNatIListKind(X) -> n__isNatIListKind(X) nil -> n__nil and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isNat(X) -> n__isNat(X) isNatKind(X) -> n__isNatKind(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__take(X1, X2)) -> take(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__length(X)) -> length(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNatIListKind(X)) -> isNatIListKind(X) activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNat(X)) -> isNat(X) activate(n__isNatKind(X)) -> isNatKind(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, V1) -> U12(isNatList(activate(V1))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1) -> U22(isNat(activate(V1))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isNatList(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isNatList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V1, V2) -> U62(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U62(tt, V2) -> U63(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U63(tt) -> tt U71(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) U81(tt) -> nil U91(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(activate(N), n__take(activate(M), activate(IL))) and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isNat(n__0) -> tt isNat(n__length(V1)) -> U11(isNatIListKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNat(n__s(V1)) -> U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNatIList(V) -> U31(isNatIListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNatIList(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatIListKind(n__nil) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatIListKind(n__take(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatKind(n__0) -> tt isNatKind(n__length(V1)) -> isNatIListKind(activate(V1)) isNatKind(n__s(V1)) -> isNatKind(activate(V1)) isNatList(n__nil) -> tt isNatList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatList(n__take(V1, V2)) -> U61(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U71(and(and(isNatList(activate(L)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(L))), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), activate(L)) take(0, IL) -> U81(and(isNatIList(IL), n__isNatIListKind(IL))) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U91(and(and(isNatIList(activate(IL)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(IL))), n__and(n__and(n__isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))), activate(IL), M, N) zeros -> n__zeros take(X1, X2) -> n__take(X1, X2) 0 -> n__0 length(X) -> n__length(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) isNatIListKind(X) -> n__isNatIListKind(X) nil -> n__nil and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isNat(X) -> n__isNat(X) isNatKind(X) -> n__isNatKind(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__take(X1, X2)) -> take(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__length(X)) -> length(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNatIListKind(X)) -> isNatIListKind(X) activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNat(X)) -> isNat(X) activate(n__isNatKind(X)) -> isNatKind(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence activate(n__s(X)) ->^+ s(activate(X)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [X / n__s(X)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, V1) -> U12(isNatList(activate(V1))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1) -> U22(isNat(activate(V1))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isNatList(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isNatList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V1, V2) -> U62(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U62(tt, V2) -> U63(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U63(tt) -> tt U71(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) U81(tt) -> nil U91(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(activate(N), n__take(activate(M), activate(IL))) and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isNat(n__0) -> tt isNat(n__length(V1)) -> U11(isNatIListKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNat(n__s(V1)) -> U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNatIList(V) -> U31(isNatIListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNatIList(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatIListKind(n__nil) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatIListKind(n__take(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatKind(n__0) -> tt isNatKind(n__length(V1)) -> isNatIListKind(activate(V1)) isNatKind(n__s(V1)) -> isNatKind(activate(V1)) isNatList(n__nil) -> tt isNatList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatList(n__take(V1, V2)) -> U61(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U71(and(and(isNatList(activate(L)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(L))), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), activate(L)) take(0, IL) -> U81(and(isNatIList(IL), n__isNatIListKind(IL))) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U91(and(and(isNatIList(activate(IL)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(IL))), n__and(n__and(n__isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))), activate(IL), M, N) zeros -> n__zeros take(X1, X2) -> n__take(X1, X2) 0 -> n__0 length(X) -> n__length(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) isNatIListKind(X) -> n__isNatIListKind(X) nil -> n__nil and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isNat(X) -> n__isNat(X) isNatKind(X) -> n__isNatKind(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__take(X1, X2)) -> take(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__length(X)) -> length(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNatIListKind(X)) -> isNatIListKind(X) activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNat(X)) -> isNat(X) activate(n__isNatKind(X)) -> isNatKind(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, V1) -> U12(isNatList(activate(V1))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1) -> U22(isNat(activate(V1))) U22(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isNatList(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isNatList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V1, V2) -> U62(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U62(tt, V2) -> U63(isNatIList(activate(V2))) U63(tt) -> tt U71(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) U81(tt) -> nil U91(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(activate(N), n__take(activate(M), activate(IL))) and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isNat(n__0) -> tt isNat(n__length(V1)) -> U11(isNatIListKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNat(n__s(V1)) -> U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1)) isNatIList(V) -> U31(isNatIListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNatIList(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatIListKind(n__nil) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__zeros) -> tt isNatIListKind(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatIListKind(n__take(V1, V2)) -> and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))) isNatKind(n__0) -> tt isNatKind(n__length(V1)) -> isNatIListKind(activate(V1)) isNatKind(n__s(V1)) -> isNatKind(activate(V1)) isNatList(n__nil) -> tt isNatList(n__cons(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNatList(n__take(V1, V2)) -> U61(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U71(and(and(isNatList(activate(L)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(L))), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), activate(L)) take(0, IL) -> U81(and(isNatIList(IL), n__isNatIListKind(IL))) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U91(and(and(isNatIList(activate(IL)), n__isNatIListKind(activate(IL))), n__and(n__and(n__isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(n__isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))), activate(IL), M, N) zeros -> n__zeros take(X1, X2) -> n__take(X1, X2) 0 -> n__0 length(X) -> n__length(X) s(X) -> n__s(X) cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) isNatIListKind(X) -> n__isNatIListKind(X) nil -> n__nil and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isNat(X) -> n__isNat(X) isNatKind(X) -> n__isNatKind(X) activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__take(X1, X2)) -> take(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__length(X)) -> length(activate(X)) activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNatIListKind(X)) -> isNatIListKind(X) activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isNat(X)) -> isNat(X) activate(n__isNatKind(X)) -> isNatKind(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (9) DecreasingLoopProof (FINISHED) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound EXP: The rewrite sequence activate(n__isNat(n__s(V11_0))) ->^+ U21(isNatKind(activate(V11_0)), activate(V11_0)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0,0]. The pumping substitution is [V11_0 / n__isNat(n__s(V11_0))]. The result substitution is [ ]. The rewrite sequence activate(n__isNat(n__s(V11_0))) ->^+ U21(isNatKind(activate(V11_0)), activate(V11_0)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1]. The pumping substitution is [V11_0 / n__isNat(n__s(V11_0))]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF)