/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: mark(x){x -> cons(x,y)} = mark(cons(x,y)) ->^+ cons(mark(x),y) = C[mark(x) = mark(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules ** Step 1.b:2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 3. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 2 0_1() -> 1 0_1() -> 3 0_1() -> 6 0_1() -> 8 0_2() -> 1 0_2() -> 7 0_2() -> 8 0_3() -> 11 a__f_0(2) -> 1 a__f_1(7) -> 1 a__f_1(8) -> 1 a__f_1(8) -> 8 a__f_2(11) -> 1 a__f_2(11) -> 8 a__p_0(2) -> 1 a__p_1(5) -> 7 a__p_1(8) -> 1 a__p_1(8) -> 8 a__p_2(10) -> 11 cons_0(2,2) -> 2 cons_1(3,4) -> 1 cons_1(8,2) -> 1 cons_1(8,2) -> 8 cons_2(7,9) -> 1 cons_2(7,9) -> 8 cons_3(11,12) -> 1 cons_3(11,12) -> 8 f_0(2) -> 2 f_1(2) -> 1 f_1(5) -> 4 f_2(7) -> 1 f_2(8) -> 1 f_2(8) -> 8 f_2(10) -> 9 f_3(11) -> 1 f_3(11) -> 8 f_3(13) -> 12 mark_0(2) -> 1 mark_1(2) -> 8 p_0(2) -> 2 p_1(2) -> 1 p_2(5) -> 7 p_2(8) -> 1 p_2(8) -> 8 p_3(10) -> 11 s_0(2) -> 2 s_1(6) -> 5 s_1(8) -> 1 s_1(8) -> 8 s_2(7) -> 10 s_3(11) -> 13 ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(0()) -> cons(0(),f(s(0()))) a__f(s(0())) -> a__f(a__p(s(0()))) a__p(X) -> p(X) a__p(s(0())) -> 0() mark(0()) -> 0() mark(cons(X1,X2)) -> cons(mark(X1),X2) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(p(X)) -> a__p(mark(X)) mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,a__p/1,mark/1} / {0/0,cons/2,f/1,p/1,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,a__p,mark} and constructors {0,cons,f,p,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))