/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: mark(x){x -> f(x)} = mark(f(x)) ->^+ a__f(mark(x)) = C[mark(x) = mark(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules ** Step 1.b:2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a__f_0(2) -> 1 a__f_1(4) -> 1 a__f_1(4) -> 4 f_0(2) -> 2 f_1(2) -> 1 f_2(4) -> 1 f_2(4) -> 4 g_0(2) -> 2 g_1(2) -> 1 g_1(2) -> 4 g_1(3) -> 1 g_2(5) -> 1 g_2(5) -> 4 h_0(2) -> 2 h_1(1) -> 3 h_1(4) -> 1 h_1(4) -> 4 h_2(1) -> 5 mark_0(2) -> 1 mark_1(2) -> 4 ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X))) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {f,g,h} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))