/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: mark(x){x -> f(x)} = mark(f(x)) ->^+ a__f(mark(x)) = C[mark(x) = mark(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules ** Step 1.b:2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 3. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 2 a_1() -> 1 a_1() -> 3 a_1() -> 5 a_2() -> 8 a__f_0(2) -> 1 a__f_1(3) -> 1 a__f_1(3) -> 3 a__f_2(6) -> 1 a__f_2(6) -> 3 f_0(2) -> 2 f_1(2) -> 1 f_1(5) -> 4 f_2(3) -> 1 f_2(3) -> 3 f_2(8) -> 7 f_3(6) -> 1 f_3(6) -> 3 g_0(2) -> 2 g_1(2) -> 1 g_1(2) -> 3 g_1(4) -> 3 g_2(7) -> 6 mark_0(2) -> 1 mark_1(2) -> 3 ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) - Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__f,mark} and constructors {a,f,g} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))