/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(),Y) -> s() dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s()) -> s() first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(),cons(Y)) -> cons(Y) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s()) -> s() terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,sqr/1,terms/1} / {0/0,cons/1,nil/0,recip/1,s/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add,dbl,first,sqr,terms} and constructors {0,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(),Y) -> s() dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s()) -> s() first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(),cons(Y)) -> cons(Y) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s()) -> s() terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,sqr/1,terms/1} / {0/0,cons/1,nil/0,recip/1,s/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add,dbl,first,sqr,terms} and constructors {0,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules * Step 3: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(),Y) -> s() dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s()) -> s() first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(),cons(Y)) -> cons(Y) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s()) -> s() terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,sqr/1,terms/1} / {0/0,cons/1,nil/0,recip/1,s/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add,dbl,first,sqr,terms} and constructors {0,cons,nil ,recip,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_0() -> 2 0_1() -> 1 0_1() -> 3 add_0(2,2) -> 1 cons_0(2) -> 1 cons_0(2) -> 2 cons_1(2) -> 1 dbl_0(2) -> 1 first_0(2,2) -> 1 nil_0() -> 1 nil_0() -> 2 nil_1() -> 1 recip_0(2) -> 1 recip_0(2) -> 2 recip_1(3) -> 1 recip_1(3) -> 2 s_0() -> 1 s_0() -> 2 s_1() -> 1 s_1() -> 3 sqr_0(2) -> 1 sqr_1(2) -> 3 terms_0(2) -> 1 2 -> 1 * Step 4: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(),Y) -> s() dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s()) -> s() first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(),cons(Y)) -> cons(Y) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s()) -> s() terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,sqr/1,terms/1} / {0/0,cons/1,nil/0,recip/1,s/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add,dbl,first,sqr,terms} and constructors {0,cons,nil ,recip,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))