/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection (9) DecreasingLoopProof [FINISHED, 243 ms] (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt, V) -> U12(isNeList(activate(V))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U22(tt, V2) -> U23(isList(activate(V2))) U23(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isQid(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNeList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V) -> U62(isQid(activate(V))) U62(tt) -> tt U71(tt, V) -> U72(isNePal(activate(V))) U72(tt) -> tt and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isList(V) -> U11(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> and(and(isQid(activate(I)), n__isPalListKind(activate(I))), n__and(n__isPal(activate(P)), n__isPalListKind(activate(P)))) isPal(V) -> U71(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__a) -> tt isPalListKind(n__e) -> tt isPalListKind(n__i) -> tt isPalListKind(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__o) -> tt isPalListKind(n__u) -> tt isPalListKind(n____(V1, V2)) -> and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))) isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) isPalListKind(X) -> n__isPalListKind(X) and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__isPalListKind(X)) -> isPalListKind(X) activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt, V) -> U12(isNeList(activate(V))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U22(tt, V2) -> U23(isList(activate(V2))) U23(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isQid(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNeList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V) -> U62(isQid(activate(V))) U62(tt) -> tt U71(tt, V) -> U72(isNePal(activate(V))) U72(tt) -> tt and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isList(V) -> U11(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> and(and(isQid(activate(I)), n__isPalListKind(activate(I))), n__and(n__isPal(activate(P)), n__isPalListKind(activate(P)))) isPal(V) -> U71(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__a) -> tt isPalListKind(n__e) -> tt isPalListKind(n__i) -> tt isPalListKind(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__o) -> tt isPalListKind(n__u) -> tt isPalListKind(n____(V1, V2)) -> and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))) isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) isPalListKind(X) -> n__isPalListKind(X) and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__isPalListKind(X)) -> isPalListKind(X) activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence activate(n____(X1, X2)) ->^+ __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. The pumping substitution is [X1 / n____(X1, X2)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt, V) -> U12(isNeList(activate(V))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U22(tt, V2) -> U23(isList(activate(V2))) U23(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isQid(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNeList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V) -> U62(isQid(activate(V))) U62(tt) -> tt U71(tt, V) -> U72(isNePal(activate(V))) U72(tt) -> tt and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isList(V) -> U11(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> and(and(isQid(activate(I)), n__isPalListKind(activate(I))), n__and(n__isPal(activate(P)), n__isPalListKind(activate(P)))) isPal(V) -> U71(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__a) -> tt isPalListKind(n__e) -> tt isPalListKind(n__i) -> tt isPalListKind(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__o) -> tt isPalListKind(n__u) -> tt isPalListKind(n____(V1, V2)) -> and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))) isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) isPalListKind(X) -> n__isPalListKind(X) and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__isPalListKind(X)) -> isPalListKind(X) activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(EXP, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: __(__(X, Y), Z) -> __(X, __(Y, Z)) __(X, nil) -> X __(nil, X) -> X U11(tt, V) -> U12(isNeList(activate(V))) U12(tt) -> tt U21(tt, V1, V2) -> U22(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U22(tt, V2) -> U23(isList(activate(V2))) U23(tt) -> tt U31(tt, V) -> U32(isQid(activate(V))) U32(tt) -> tt U41(tt, V1, V2) -> U42(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U42(tt, V2) -> U43(isNeList(activate(V2))) U43(tt) -> tt U51(tt, V1, V2) -> U52(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2)) U52(tt, V2) -> U53(isList(activate(V2))) U53(tt) -> tt U61(tt, V) -> U62(isQid(activate(V))) U62(tt) -> tt U71(tt, V) -> U72(isNePal(activate(V))) U72(tt) -> tt and(tt, X) -> activate(X) isList(V) -> U11(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isList(n__nil) -> tt isList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U21(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(V) -> U31(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U41(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) -> U51(and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2)) isNePal(V) -> U61(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) -> and(and(isQid(activate(I)), n__isPalListKind(activate(I))), n__and(n__isPal(activate(P)), n__isPalListKind(activate(P)))) isPal(V) -> U71(isPalListKind(activate(V)), activate(V)) isPal(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__a) -> tt isPalListKind(n__e) -> tt isPalListKind(n__i) -> tt isPalListKind(n__nil) -> tt isPalListKind(n__o) -> tt isPalListKind(n__u) -> tt isPalListKind(n____(V1, V2)) -> and(isPalListKind(activate(V1)), n__isPalListKind(activate(V2))) isQid(n__a) -> tt isQid(n__e) -> tt isQid(n__i) -> tt isQid(n__o) -> tt isQid(n__u) -> tt nil -> n__nil __(X1, X2) -> n____(X1, X2) isPalListKind(X) -> n__isPalListKind(X) and(X1, X2) -> n__and(X1, X2) isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X) a -> n__a e -> n__e i -> n__i o -> n__o u -> n__u activate(n__nil) -> nil activate(n____(X1, X2)) -> __(activate(X1), activate(X2)) activate(n__isPalListKind(X)) -> isPalListKind(X) activate(n__and(X1, X2)) -> and(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X) activate(n__a) -> a activate(n__e) -> e activate(n__i) -> i activate(n__o) -> o activate(n__u) -> u activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (9) DecreasingLoopProof (FINISHED) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound EXP: The rewrite sequence activate(n__isPal(X)) ->^+ U71(isPalListKind(activate(X)), activate(X)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0,0]. The pumping substitution is [X / n__isPal(X)]. The result substitution is [ ]. The rewrite sequence activate(n__isPal(X)) ->^+ U71(isPalListKind(activate(X)), activate(X)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1]. The pumping substitution is [X / n__isPal(X)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (10) BOUNDS(EXP, INF)