/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
* Step 1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            activate(X) -> X
            activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
            f(X) -> n__f(X)
            f(0()) -> cons(0(),n__f(s(0())))
            f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
            p(s(0())) -> 0()
        - Signature:
            {activate/1,f/1,p/1} / {0/0,cons/2,n__f/1,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,p} and constructors {0,cons,n__f,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
* Step 2: ToInnermost.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            activate(X) -> X
            activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
            f(X) -> n__f(X)
            f(0()) -> cons(0(),n__f(s(0())))
            f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
            p(s(0())) -> 0()
        - Signature:
            {activate/1,f/1,p/1} / {0/0,cons/2,n__f/1,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,p} and constructors {0,cons,n__f,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
* Step 3: Bounds.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            activate(X) -> X
            activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
            f(X) -> n__f(X)
            f(0()) -> cons(0(),n__f(s(0())))
            f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
            p(s(0())) -> 0()
        - Signature:
            {activate/1,f/1,p/1} / {0/0,cons/2,n__f/1,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,p} and constructors {0,cons,n__f,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 1
          0_0() -> 2
          0_1() -> 1
          0_1() -> 3
          0_1() -> 6
          0_2() -> 1
          0_2() -> 2
          activate_0(2) -> 1
          cons_0(2,2) -> 1
          cons_0(2,2) -> 2
          cons_1(3,4) -> 1
          cons_2(2,7) -> 1
          f_0(2) -> 1
          f_1(2) -> 1
          n__f_0(2) -> 1
          n__f_0(2) -> 2
          n__f_1(2) -> 1
          n__f_1(5) -> 4
          n__f_2(2) -> 1
          n__f_2(8) -> 7
          p_0(2) -> 1
          p_1(5) -> 1
          p_1(5) -> 2
          s_0(2) -> 1
          s_0(2) -> 2
          s_1(6) -> 5
          s_2(2) -> 8
          2 -> 1
* Step 4: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            activate(X) -> X
            activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X)
            f(X) -> n__f(X)
            f(0()) -> cons(0(),n__f(s(0())))
            f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0())))
            p(s(0())) -> 0()
        - Signature:
            {activate/1,f/1,p/1} / {0/0,cons/2,n__f/1,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,p} and constructors {0,cons,n__f,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))