/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(y,x) -> y a(y,c(b(a(0(),x),0()))) -> b(a(c(b(0(),y)),x),0()) b(x,y) -> c(a(c(y),a(0(),x))) - Signature: {a/2,b/2} / {0/0,c/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a,b} and constructors {0,c} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(y,x) -> y a(y,c(b(a(0(),x),0()))) -> b(a(c(b(0(),y)),x),0()) b(x,y) -> c(a(c(y),a(0(),x))) - Signature: {a/2,b/2} / {0/0,c/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a,b} and constructors {0,c} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_0() -> 2 0_1() -> 5 0_1() -> 6 a_0(2,2) -> 1 a_1(4,5) -> 3 a_1(6,2) -> 5 b_0(2,2) -> 1 c_0(2) -> 1 c_0(2) -> 2 c_1(2) -> 3 c_1(2) -> 4 c_1(3) -> 1 2 -> 1 4 -> 3 6 -> 5 * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a(y,x) -> y a(y,c(b(a(0(),x),0()))) -> b(a(c(b(0(),y)),x),0()) b(x,y) -> c(a(c(y),a(0(),x))) - Signature: {a/2,b/2} / {0/0,c/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a,b} and constructors {0,c} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))