/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: isEmpty(cons(x, xs)) -> false isEmpty(nil) -> true isZero(0) -> true isZero(s(x)) -> false head(cons(x, xs)) -> x tail(cons(x, xs)) -> xs tail(nil) -> nil append(nil, x) -> cons(x, nil) append(cons(y, ys), x) -> cons(y, append(ys, x)) p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x))) p(s(0)) -> 0 p(0) -> 0 inc(s(x)) -> s(inc(x)) inc(0) -> s(0) addLists(xs, ys, zs) -> if(isEmpty(xs), isEmpty(ys), isZero(head(xs)), tail(xs), tail(ys), cons(p(head(xs)), tail(xs)), cons(inc(head(ys)), tail(ys)), zs, append(zs, head(ys))) if(true, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> zs if(true, false, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, false, false, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs2, ys2, zs) if(false, false, true, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs, ys, zs2) addList(xs, ys) -> addLists(xs, ys, nil) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: isEmpty(cons(x, xs)) -> false isEmpty(nil) -> true isZero(0) -> true isZero(s(x)) -> false head(cons(x, xs)) -> x tail(cons(x, xs)) -> xs tail(nil) -> nil append(nil, x) -> cons(x, nil) append(cons(y, ys), x) -> cons(y, append(ys, x)) p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x))) p(s(0)) -> 0 p(0) -> 0 inc(s(x)) -> s(inc(x)) inc(0) -> s(0) addLists(xs, ys, zs) -> if(isEmpty(xs), isEmpty(ys), isZero(head(xs)), tail(xs), tail(ys), cons(p(head(xs)), tail(xs)), cons(inc(head(ys)), tail(ys)), zs, append(zs, head(ys))) if(true, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> zs if(true, false, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, false, false, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs2, ys2, zs) if(false, false, true, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs, ys, zs2) addList(xs, ys) -> addLists(xs, ys, nil) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): The rewrite sequence append(cons(y, ys), x) ->^+ cons(y, append(ys, x)) gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [1]. The pumping substitution is [ys / cons(y, ys)]. The result substitution is [ ]. ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (BEST) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: isEmpty(cons(x, xs)) -> false isEmpty(nil) -> true isZero(0) -> true isZero(s(x)) -> false head(cons(x, xs)) -> x tail(cons(x, xs)) -> xs tail(nil) -> nil append(nil, x) -> cons(x, nil) append(cons(y, ys), x) -> cons(y, append(ys, x)) p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x))) p(s(0)) -> 0 p(0) -> 0 inc(s(x)) -> s(inc(x)) inc(0) -> s(0) addLists(xs, ys, zs) -> if(isEmpty(xs), isEmpty(ys), isZero(head(xs)), tail(xs), tail(ys), cons(p(head(xs)), tail(xs)), cons(inc(head(ys)), tail(ys)), zs, append(zs, head(ys))) if(true, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> zs if(true, false, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, false, false, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs2, ys2, zs) if(false, false, true, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs, ys, zs2) addList(xs, ys) -> addLists(xs, ys, nil) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) Propagated lower bound. ---------------------------------------- (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: isEmpty(cons(x, xs)) -> false isEmpty(nil) -> true isZero(0) -> true isZero(s(x)) -> false head(cons(x, xs)) -> x tail(cons(x, xs)) -> xs tail(nil) -> nil append(nil, x) -> cons(x, nil) append(cons(y, ys), x) -> cons(y, append(ys, x)) p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x))) p(s(0)) -> 0 p(0) -> 0 inc(s(x)) -> s(inc(x)) inc(0) -> s(0) addLists(xs, ys, zs) -> if(isEmpty(xs), isEmpty(ys), isZero(head(xs)), tail(xs), tail(ys), cons(p(head(xs)), tail(xs)), cons(inc(head(ys)), tail(ys)), zs, append(zs, head(ys))) if(true, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> zs if(true, false, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, true, b, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> differentLengthError if(false, false, false, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs2, ys2, zs) if(false, false, true, xs, ys, xs2, ys2, zs, zs2) -> addLists(xs, ys, zs2) addList(xs, ys) -> addLists(xs, ys, nil) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL