/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: c(y) -> y c(a(a(0(),x),y)) -> a(c(c(c(0()))),y) c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(y,0()))) - Signature: {c/1} / {0/0,a/2} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {c} and constructors {0,a} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: c(y) -> y c(a(a(0(),x),y)) -> a(c(c(c(0()))),y) c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(y,0()))) - Signature: {c/1} / {0/0,a/2} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {c} and constructors {0,a} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_0() -> 2 0_1() -> 3 0_1() -> 4 0_1() -> 5 0_1() -> 6 0_2() -> 9 a_0(2,2) -> 1 a_0(2,2) -> 2 a_1(3,2) -> 1 a_2(6,9) -> 3 a_2(6,9) -> 7 a_2(6,9) -> 8 c_0(2) -> 1 c_1(4) -> 3 c_1(5) -> 3 c_1(5) -> 4 c_1(6) -> 3 c_1(6) -> 4 c_1(6) -> 5 c_2(7) -> 3 c_2(8) -> 3 c_2(8) -> 7 2 -> 1 4 -> 3 5 -> 3 5 -> 4 6 -> 3 6 -> 4 6 -> 5 7 -> 3 8 -> 3 8 -> 7 * Step 3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: c(y) -> y c(a(a(0(),x),y)) -> a(c(c(c(0()))),y) c(c(c(y))) -> c(c(a(y,0()))) - Signature: {c/1} / {0/0,a/2} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {c} and constructors {0,a} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))