/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?, O(1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). (0) CpxTRS (1) DependencyGraphProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, 1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(x)) -> f(c(f(x))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x)) -> x g(d(x)) -> x g(c(0)) -> g(d(1)) g(c(1)) -> g(d(0)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyGraphProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) The following rules are not reachable from basic terms in the dependency graph and can be removed: f(f(x)) -> f(c(f(x))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(c(x)) -> x g(d(x)) -> x g(c(0)) -> g(d(1)) g(c(1)) -> g(d(0)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof (FINISHED) Constant runtime complexity proven by termination of constructor-based narrowing. The maximal most general narrowing sequences give rise to the following rewrite sequences: g(c(1)) ->^* 0 g(c(0)) ->^* 1 ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(1, 1)