/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(2) TRS for Loop Detection
(3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(4) BEST
    (5) proven lower bound
        (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
        (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
    (8) TRS for Loop Detection


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   eq(0, 0) -> true
   eq(0, s(x)) -> false
   eq(s(x), 0) -> false
   eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
   or(true, y) -> true
   or(false, y) -> y
   union(empty, h) -> h
   union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
   reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
   reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
   if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
   if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
----------------------------------------

(1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID))
Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem.
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops:

The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   eq(0, 0) -> true
   eq(0, s(x)) -> false
   eq(s(x), 0) -> false
   eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
   or(true, y) -> true
   or(false, y) -> y
   union(empty, h) -> h
   union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
   reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
   reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
   if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
   if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
----------------------------------------

(3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID))
The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1):

The rewrite sequence

union(edge(x, y, i), h) ->^+ edge(x, y, union(i, h))

gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [2].

The pumping substitution is [i / edge(x, y, i)].

The result substitution is [ ].




----------------------------------------

(4)
Complex Obligation (BEST)

----------------------------------------

(5)
Obligation:
Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation:

The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   eq(0, 0) -> true
   eq(0, s(x)) -> false
   eq(s(x), 0) -> false
   eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
   or(true, y) -> true
   or(false, y) -> y
   union(empty, h) -> h
   union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
   reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
   reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
   if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
   if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
----------------------------------------

(6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED)
Propagated lower bound.
----------------------------------------

(7)
BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops:

The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   eq(0, 0) -> true
   eq(0, s(x)) -> false
   eq(s(x), 0) -> false
   eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
   or(true, y) -> true
   or(false, y) -> y
   union(empty, h) -> h
   union(edge(x, y, i), h) -> edge(x, y, union(i, h))
   reach(x, y, empty, h) -> false
   reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
   if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> true
   if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
   if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) -> reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL