/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,d,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,d,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,d,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(c(x,y)){x -> s(x)} = f(c(s(x),y)) ->^+ f(c(x,s(y))) = C[f(c(x,s(y))) = f(c(x,y)){y -> s(y)}] ** Step 1.b:1: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,d,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. c_0(1,1) -> 1 c_0(1,1) -> 3 c_0(1,2) -> 1 c_0(1,2) -> 3 c_0(1,5) -> 1 c_0(1,5) -> 3 c_0(2,1) -> 1 c_0(2,1) -> 3 c_0(2,2) -> 1 c_0(2,2) -> 3 c_0(2,5) -> 1 c_0(2,5) -> 3 c_0(5,1) -> 1 c_0(5,1) -> 3 c_0(5,2) -> 1 c_0(5,2) -> 3 c_0(5,5) -> 1 c_0(5,5) -> 3 c_1(1,7) -> 3 c_1(1,7) -> 6 c_1(2,7) -> 3 c_1(2,7) -> 6 c_1(5,7) -> 3 c_1(5,7) -> 6 c_1(7,1) -> 8 c_1(7,2) -> 8 c_1(7,5) -> 8 d_0(1) -> 2 d_0(1) -> 3 d_0(2) -> 2 d_0(2) -> 3 d_0(5) -> 2 d_0(5) -> 3 f_0(1) -> 3 f_0(2) -> 3 f_0(5) -> 3 f_1(6) -> 3 g_0(1) -> 4 g_0(2) -> 4 g_0(5) -> 4 g_1(8) -> 4 s_0(1) -> 3 s_0(1) -> 5 s_0(2) -> 3 s_0(2) -> 5 s_0(5) -> 3 s_0(5) -> 5 s_1(1) -> 7 s_1(2) -> 7 s_1(5) -> 7 s_1(7) -> 7 1 -> 3 2 -> 3 5 -> 3 6 -> 3 ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {c,d,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))