/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: f(x){x -> s(s(x))} = f(s(s(x))) ->^+ s(s(f(x))) = C[f(x) = f(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: ToInnermost + Details: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules ** Step 1.b:2: Bounds. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_1() -> 3 0_1() -> 5 0_1() -> 6 f_0(1) -> 2 f_0(4) -> 2 f_1(1) -> 3 f_1(1) -> 6 f_1(4) -> 3 f_1(4) -> 6 g_0(1) -> 3 g_0(4) -> 3 g_1(1) -> 6 g_1(4) -> 6 s_0(1) -> 4 s_0(4) -> 4 s_1(5) -> 2 s_1(6) -> 3 s_1(6) -> 5 s_1(6) -> 6 ** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(0()) -> s(0()) f(s(x)) -> s(s(g(x))) g(0()) -> 0() g(s(x)) -> f(x) - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {0/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {0,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))