/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^2)) * Step 1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) -> x *(+(x,y),z) -> +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2,1/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+,1} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: Sum. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) -> x *(+(x,y),z) -> +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2,1/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+,1} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops. WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) -> x *(+(x,y),z) -> +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2,1/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+,1} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: *(x,y){y -> +(y,z)} = *(x,+(y,z)) ->^+ +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) = C[*(x,y) = *(x,y){}] ** Step 1.b:1: NaturalPI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) -> x *(+(x,y),z) -> +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2,1/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+,1} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(mixed(2)): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(+) = {1,2} Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(*) = 4*x1 + 3*x1*x2 + 5*x2 p(+) = 2 + x1 + x2 p(1) = 2 Following rules are strictly oriented: *(x,+(y,z)) = 10 + 10*x + 3*x*y + 3*x*z + 5*y + 5*z > 2 + 8*x + 3*x*y + 3*x*z + 5*y + 5*z = +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) = 10 + 10*x > x = x *(+(x,y),z) = 8 + 4*x + 3*x*z + 4*y + 3*y*z + 11*z > 2 + 4*x + 3*x*z + 4*y + 3*y*z + 10*z = +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) = 8 + 11*y > y = y Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: *(x,+(y,z)) -> +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) *(x,1()) -> x *(+(x,y),z) -> +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) *(1(),y) -> y - Signature: {*/2} / {+/2,1/0} - Obligation: runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {*} and constructors {+,1} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^2))