/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?, O(1))
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).

(0) CpxTRS
(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, 1)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, 1).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   gcd(x, 0) -> x
   gcd(0, y) -> y
   gcd(s(x), s(y)) -> if(<(x, y), gcd(s(x), -(y, x)), gcd(-(x, y), s(y)))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL
----------------------------------------

(1) NarrowingOnBasicTermsTerminatesProof (FINISHED)
Constant runtime complexity proven by termination of constructor-based narrowing.

The maximal most general narrowing sequences give rise to the following rewrite sequences:

gcd(s(x0), s(x1)) ->^* if(<(x0, x1), gcd(s(x0), -(x1, x0)), gcd(-(x0, x1), s(x1)))




----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, 1)