/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_rc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
* Step 1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
** Step 1.a:1: Sum.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
    + Details:
        ()
** Step 1.a:2: DecreasingLoops.  WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
    + Details:
        The system has following decreasing Loops:
          +(x,y){x -> s(x)} =
            +(s(x),y) ->^+ +(x,s(y))
              = C[+(x,s(y)) = +(x,y){y -> s(y)}]

** Step 1.b:1: ToInnermost.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
             runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        ToInnermost
    + Details:
        switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
** Step 1.b:2: Bounds.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          +_0(2,2) -> 1
          +_1(2,2) -> 4
          +_1(2,3) -> 1
          +_1(2,3) -> 4
          0_0() -> 1
          0_0() -> 2
          0_0() -> 4
          s_0(2) -> 1
          s_0(2) -> 2
          s_0(2) -> 4
          s_1(1) -> 1
          s_1(2) -> 1
          s_1(2) -> 3
          s_1(2) -> 4
          s_1(3) -> 1
          s_1(3) -> 3
          s_1(3) -> 4
          s_1(4) -> 1
          s_1(4) -> 4
          2 -> 1
          2 -> 4
          3 -> 1
          3 -> 4
** Step 1.b:3: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            +(0(),y) -> y
            +(s(x),y) -> +(x,s(y))
            +(s(x),y) -> s(+(x,y))
        - Signature:
            {+/2} / {0/0,s/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {0,s}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))