/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven: (0) CTRS (1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 49 ms] (4) QTRS (5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] (6) QTRS (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Conditional term rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(x, x) -> A The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules: f(x) -> e <= d -> l ---------------------------------------- (1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND) The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x) -> U1(d) U1(l) -> e h(x, x) -> A Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(A) = 0 POL(U1(x_1)) = 2*x_1 POL(d) = 1 POL(e) = 2 POL(f(x_1)) = 2 + x_1 POL(h(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 POL(l) = 1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: h(x, x) -> A ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x) -> U1(d) U1(l) -> e Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:f_1 > U1_1 > e > l > d and weight map: d=2 l=1 e=2 f_1=2 U1_1=1 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: f(x) -> U1(d) U1(l) -> e ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES