/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven: (0) CTRS (1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 62 ms] (4) QTRS (5) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QTRS (7) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Conditional term rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: g(d, x, x) -> A h(x, x) -> g(x, x, f(k)) c -> e' a -> c a -> d b -> c b -> d c -> e c -> l k -> l k -> m d -> m The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules: f(x) -> x <= x -> e, x -> e' ---------------------------------------- (1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND) The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x) -> U1(x, x) U1(e, x) -> U2(x, x) U2(e', x) -> x g(d, x, x) -> A h(x, x) -> g(x, x, f(k)) c -> e' a -> c a -> d b -> c b -> d c -> e c -> l k -> l k -> m d -> m Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Quasi precedence: [d, c, a, b] > e [d, c, a, b] > e' [d, c, a, b] > A [d, c, a, b] > l [d, c, a, b] > m h_2 > f_1 > U1_2 > U2_2 h_2 > g_3 > A h_2 > k > l h_2 > k > m Status: f_1: [1] U1_2: [2,1] e: multiset status U2_2: [2,1] e': multiset status g_3: multiset status d: multiset status A: multiset status h_2: [1,2] k: multiset status c: multiset status a: multiset status b: multiset status l: multiset status m: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: f(x) -> U1(x, x) U1(e, x) -> U2(x, x) U2(e', x) -> x g(d, x, x) -> A h(x, x) -> g(x, x, f(k)) c -> e' c -> e c -> l k -> l k -> m d -> m ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a -> c a -> d b -> c b -> d Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:a > b > c > d and weight map: a=1 c=1 d=1 b=1 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: a -> c a -> d b -> c b -> d ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (7) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (8) YES