/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Quasi decreasingness of the given CTRS could be proven: (0) CTRS (1) CTRSToQTRSProof [SOUND, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 24 ms] (4) QTRS (5) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Conditional term rewrite system: The TRS R is empty. The conditional TRS C consists of the following conditional rules: f(x', x'') -> g(x) <= x' -> x, x'' -> x f(y', h(y'')) -> g(y) <= y' -> y, y'' -> y ---------------------------------------- (1) CTRSToQTRSProof (SOUND) The conditional rules have been transormed into unconditional rules according to [CTRS,AAECCNOC]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x', x'') -> U1(x', x'') U1(x, x'') -> U2(x'', x) U2(x, x) -> g(x) f(y', h(y'')) -> U3(y', y'') U3(y, y'') -> U4(y'', y) U4(y, y) -> g(y) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:U4_2 > U2_2 > f_2 > U3_2 > U1_2 > h_1 > g_1 and weight map: g_1=1 h_1=1 f_2=2 U1_2=1 U2_2=0 U3_2=3 U4_2=0 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: f(x', x'') -> U1(x', x'') U1(x, x'') -> U2(x'', x) U2(x, x) -> g(x) f(y', h(y'')) -> U3(y', y'') U3(y, y'') -> U4(y'', y) U4(y, y) -> g(y) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES