/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.hs /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.hs # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty H-Termination with start terms of the given HASKELL could be proven: (0) HASKELL (1) BR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) HASKELL (3) COR [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) HASKELL (5) Narrow [SOUND, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: mainModule Main module Maybe where { import qualified List; import qualified Main; import qualified Prelude; } module List where { import qualified Main; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; tails :: [a] -> [[a]]; tails [] = [] : []; tails xxs@(_ : xs) = xxs : tails xs; } module Main where { import qualified List; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; } ---------------------------------------- (1) BR (EQUIVALENT) Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns. Binding Reductions: The bind variable of the following binding Pattern "xxs@(vz : wu)" is replaced by the following term "vz : wu" ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: mainModule Main module Maybe where { import qualified List; import qualified Main; import qualified Prelude; } module List where { import qualified Main; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; tails :: [a] -> [[a]]; tails [] = [] : []; tails (vz : wu) = (vz : wu) : tails wu; } module Main where { import qualified List; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; } ---------------------------------------- (3) COR (EQUIVALENT) Cond Reductions: The following Function with conditions "undefined |Falseundefined; " is transformed to "undefined = undefined1; " "undefined0 True = undefined; " "undefined1 = undefined0 False; " ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: mainModule Main module Maybe where { import qualified List; import qualified Main; import qualified Prelude; } module List where { import qualified Main; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; tails :: [a] -> [[a]]; tails [] = [] : []; tails (vz : wu) = (vz : wu) : tails wu; } module Main where { import qualified List; import qualified Maybe; import qualified Prelude; } ---------------------------------------- (5) Narrow (SOUND) Haskell To QDPs digraph dp_graph { node [outthreshold=100, inthreshold=100];1[label="List.tails",fontsize=16,color="grey",shape="box"];1 -> 3[label="",style="dashed", color="grey", weight=3]; 3[label="List.tails wv3",fontsize=16,color="burlywood",shape="triangle"];10[label="wv3/wv30 : wv31",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];3 -> 10[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 10 -> 4[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 11[label="wv3/[]",fontsize=10,color="white",style="solid",shape="box"];3 -> 11[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=9]; 11 -> 5[label="",style="solid", color="burlywood", weight=3]; 4[label="List.tails (wv30 : wv31)",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];4 -> 6[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 5[label="List.tails []",fontsize=16,color="black",shape="box"];5 -> 7[label="",style="solid", color="black", weight=3]; 6[label="(wv30 : wv31) : List.tails wv31",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];6 -> 8[label="",style="dashed", color="green", weight=3]; 7[label="[] : []",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];8 -> 3[label="",style="dashed", color="red", weight=0]; 8[label="List.tails wv31",fontsize=16,color="magenta"];8 -> 9[label="",style="dashed", color="magenta", weight=3]; 9[label="wv31",fontsize=16,color="green",shape="box"];} ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: new_tails(:(wv30, wv31), ba) -> new_tails(wv31, ba) R is empty. Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (7) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT) By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: *new_tails(:(wv30, wv31), ba) -> new_tails(wv31, ba) The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2 ---------------------------------------- (8) YES