/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1)).

(0) CpxIntTrs
(1) Koat2 Proof [FINISHED, 147 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1))


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
eval(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A, A + B)) :|: A >= 1 && A >= B + 1
start(A, B) -> Com_1(eval(A, B)) :|: TRUE

The start-symbols are:[start_2]


----------------------------------------

(1) Koat2 Proof (FINISHED)
YES( ?, max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)})



Initial Complexity Problem:

  Start:  start  

  Program_Vars:  Arg_0, Arg_1  

  Temp_Vars:    

  Locations:  eval, start  

  Transitions:

  0: eval->eval

  1: start->eval  



Timebounds: 

  Overall timebound: max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}

  0: eval->eval: max([0, 1+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}

  1: start->eval: 1 {O(1)}



Costbounds:

  Overall costbound: max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}

  0: eval->eval: max([0, 1+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}

  1: start->eval: 1 {O(1)}



Sizebounds:

`Lower:

  0: eval->eval, Arg_0: 1 {O(1)}

  0: eval->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)}

  1: start->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)}

  1: start->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)}

`Upper:

  0: eval->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)}

  0: eval->eval, Arg_1: 2*Arg_0 {O(n)}

  1: start->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)}

  1: start->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)}


----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1))