/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1)). (0) CpxIntTrs (1) Koat2 Proof [FINISHED, 147 ms] (2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1)) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules: eval(A, B, C) -> Com_1(eval(A, B + C, C)) :|: A >= B && C >= 1 start(A, B, C) -> Com_1(eval(A, B, C)) :|: TRUE The start-symbols are:[start_3] ---------------------------------------- (1) Koat2 Proof (FINISHED) YES( ?, max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)}) Initial Complexity Problem: Start: start Program_Vars: Arg_0, Arg_1, Arg_2 Temp_Vars: Locations: eval, start Transitions: 0: eval->eval 1: start->eval Timebounds: Overall timebound: max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 0: eval->eval: max([0, 1+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 1: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} Costbounds: Overall costbound: max([1, 2+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 0: eval->eval: max([0, 1+Arg_0-Arg_1]) {O(n)} 1: start->eval: 1 {O(1)} Sizebounds: `Lower: 0: eval->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 0: eval->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 0: eval->eval, Arg_2: 1 {O(1)} 1: start->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 1: start->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 1: start->eval, Arg_2: Arg_2 {O(n)} `Upper: 0: eval->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 0: eval->eval, Arg_1: max([Arg_2, max([Arg_2, Arg_1])])+max([0, Arg_2*(1+Arg_0-Arg_1)]) {O(n^2)} 0: eval->eval, Arg_2: Arg_2 {O(n)} 1: start->eval, Arg_0: Arg_0 {O(n)} 1: start->eval, Arg_1: Arg_1 {O(n)} 1: start->eval, Arg_2: Arg_2 {O(n)} ---------------------------------------- (2) BOUNDS(1, max(1, 2 + Arg_0 + -1 * Arg_1))