/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_complexity /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MAYBE
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.koat
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The runtime complexity of the given CpxIntTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).

(0) CpxIntTrs
(1) Loat Proof [FINISHED, 252 ms]
(2) BOUNDS(1, INF)


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Complexity Int TRS consisting of the following rules:
eval(A, B, C) -> Com_1(eval(A + B, B - 2, C + 1)) :|: A >= 0
eval(A, B, C) -> Com_1(eval(A + C, B, C - 2)) :|: A >= 0
start(A, B, C) -> Com_1(eval(A, B, C)) :|: TRUE

The start-symbols are:[start_3]


----------------------------------------

(1) Loat Proof (FINISHED)


### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###



Initial linear ITS problem

   Start location: start

      0: eval -> eval : A'=A+B, B'=-2+B, C'=1+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1

      1: eval -> eval : A'=C+A, C'=-2+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1

      2: start -> eval : [], cost: 1



Checking for constant complexity:

   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:

      2: start -> eval : [], cost: 1



### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###



Accelerating simple loops of location 0.

   Accelerating the following rules:

      0: eval -> eval : A'=A+B, B'=-2+B, C'=1+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1

      1: eval -> eval : A'=C+A, C'=-2+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1



   Found no metering function for rule 0.

   Found no metering function for rule 1.

   Removing the simple loops:.



Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):

   Start location: start

      0: eval -> eval : A'=A+B, B'=-2+B, C'=1+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1

      1: eval -> eval : A'=C+A, C'=-2+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 1

      2: start -> eval : [], cost: 1



Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):

   Start location: start

      2: start -> eval : [], cost: 1

      3: start -> eval : A'=A+B, B'=-2+B, C'=1+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 2

      4: start -> eval : A'=C+A, C'=-2+C, [ A>=0 ], cost: 2



Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):

   Start location: start

     <empty>



### Computing asymptotic complexity ###



Fully simplified ITS problem

   Start location: start

     <empty>



Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):

   Complexity:  Constant

   Cpx degree:  0

   Solved cost: 1

   Rule cost:   1

   Rule guard:  []



WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)


----------------------------------------

(2)
BOUNDS(1, INF)